Force of Government and the Church

 

 

 

 

 

Before we get started, let’s give a nod to our glorious leader by mentioning that today in history was the beginning of the Islamic calendar on January 23rd, 638AD.

The Church in Nazi Germany was subjected to as much pressure as any other organization in Germany. Any threat to Hitler would not be tolerated and the churches of Germany presented the Nazis with numerous threats.

In 1933, the Catholic Church had viewed the Nazis as a barrier to the spread of communism from Russia. In this year, Hitler and the Catholic Church signed an agreement that he would not interfere with the Catholic Church while the Church would not comment on politics. When signing a pact with the Devil, one should always keep in mind that he is “The Devil” Seems the Church of Rome should have thought this through a little better.

This pact lasted until 1937, when Hitler started a concerted attack on the Catholic Church arresting priests etc. In 1937, the Pope, Pius XI, issued his “Mit brennender Sorge” statement (“With burning anxiety”) over what was going on inGermany.

The Protestant Church was easier to deal with because of their numerous denominations. The Protestants themselves were split. The “German Christians” were lead by Ludwig Muller who believed that any member of the church who had Jewish ancestry should be removed from the church. Muller supported Hitler and in 1933 he was given the title of “Reich Bishop”. Makes one wonder just how much he is enjoying his place in Hell now, “Heil Hitler”

Those who opposed the views of Muller were called the “Confessing Church”. This was led by Martin Niemoller. He had become famous in Germany while being a World War One U-boat captain. That made him a potentially embarrassing foe to the Nazis. He was arrested by the Gestapo for opposing Hitler. Niemoller was sent to a concentration camp for 7 years where he was kept in solitary confinement. Many other Confessional Church members suffered the same fate.

According to  Eric Johnson, in his book Nazi terror: the Gestapo, Jews, and ordinary Germans. New York: Basic Books, p. 10. “The German census of May 1939 indicates that 54 percent of Germans considered themselves Protestant and 40 percent considered themselves Catholic, with only 3.5 percent claiming to be neo-pagan “believers in God,” and 1.5 percent unbelievers. This census came more than six years into the Hitler era.”

Here is a good link for an overview of Christianity in Nazi Germany is you are interested. It makes one wonder how could a seemingly religious and Christian country allow itself to become part of something so evil and hell bound as Nazi Germany. It is almost unfathomable isn’t? Well, is it? I don’t think it is as unthinkable as it would seem. Even for the enlightened and educated American.

For a number of years now, the churches here in the United States of Americahave refrained from political speech because of Internal Revenue Service rules and their own tax exempt status. That goes for all churches except those that promote the Democratic agenda and the Progressive redistribution of wealth promoted by the African- American and Gay-Clergy churches.  In those churches, it seems to be allowed for some reason.

Churches have made a big point to steer clear of political content and siding with one side or the other. Why, it comes down to money. The churches always tell us that, “we have to do this to keep our taxes down” and the “The church would go out of business without that tax exemption. Oh really? Capitulation is rarely, if ever, a sudden slamming of the totalitarian door. It comes in tiny or sometimes small footsteps. Footsteps, footsteps! The tax is the government boot being slowly, yet firmly, being applied to the backsides and neck of the American Christian Church.

Enter Hate Crimes Legislation.

Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990 (HCSA) Enacted in 1990, the Hate Crime Statistics Act (HCSA) requires the Justice Department to collect data on crimes which “manifest prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity” from law enforcement agencies across the country and to publish an annual summary of the findings.

Hate Crimes Sentencing Enhancement Act of 1994 Originally introduced by Rep. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) as freestanding legislation, the Hate Crimes Sentencing Enhancement Act was enacted into law as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Pursuant to the Act, the United States Sentencing Commission established a sentencing enhancement of “not less than 3 offense levels for [federal] offenses that the finder of fact at trial determines beyond a reasonable doubt are hate crimes.” The enhancement defines a hate crime as “a crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim, or in the case of a property crime, the property that is the object of the crime, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person.”

The Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 The Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 was enacted in response to a disturbing rash of arson directed at houses of worship, with African American churches disproportionately victimized. According to Justice Department officials, DOJ opened 658 investigations of suspicious fires, bombings, and attempted bombings from January 1, 1995, to August 18, 1998. Of the 658 attacks directed against houses of worship, 220 were predominantly African-American institutions. The Church Arson Prevention Act was initially sponsored by Sens. Lauch Faircloth (R-NC) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and by Reps. Henry Hyde (R-IL) and John Conyers (D-MI).

107th Congress (2001-2002)The Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act (LLEEA) (S.625) was introduced onMarch 27, 2001. The measure would have removed existing obstacles to federal hate crime prosecutions and extended federal hate crime law that currently covers race, religion and national origin to cover hate crimes based on actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender or disability.

109th Congress (2005-2006) The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005, passed September 14 as an amendment to H.R. 3132, the Children’s Safety Act of 2005, would have expanded the definition of hate crimes to include offenses involving actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.

110th Congress (2007-2008) In 2007, Congress came closer than ever in addressing a critical gap in current federal hate crimes law and expanded existing hate crimes coverage to include violence based on sexual orientation, gender, and disability. The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007 (H.R. 1592) was introduced in the House onMarch 20, 2007, and in the Senate onApril 12, 2007.

111th Congress (2009-2010) The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (LLEHCPA) was introduced in the 111th Congress by Representatives John Conyers, D. Mich., and Mark Kirk, R. Ill., in the House.

Although no person, of any age, gender, race, or lifestyle should ever be a victim of hate induced criminal activity, should it be necessary to make a special status for those of any other category than, average American White Christian Straight person? Isn’t any violent crime against any innocent party really a crime of hate? Only those inEuropeandAmerica’s progressive movements would seem to think so enough to further place their metal studded Jack boots harder on the necks of their citizens.

Hate Crimes laws have lead to Christian ministers andChristian people being fines and jail all over Europe,AustraliaandCanada. These laws are not so much to help those it covers as they are to punish and quiet the pesky Religious Right of those nations. Is it any wonder that all of these nations enacted strict gun control and gun confiscation before enacting the Hate Crimes laws? Do you think it will be any different here in the good ol’ US of A? I don’t think so.

Progressives and the Democratic Party here in the USA use their elected powers to subjugate the American people. Is it any wonder that we see attacks such as Waco and Ruby Ridge, and repelling of DADT, the push for stricter gun control, the take over of internet and net neutrality and the Fairness Doctrine under Democratic Presidents and Congress’? The Democrats only want to use their power to control you and me.

Now we have Obama trying to force the Catholic Church and Catholic Services to provide not only contraception, but also abortion day after pills, and provide monies toward public abortion.

The people of America have to make up their minds. We all set back and say, “Well, we don’t have a choice that is what the government makes us do”Patriots, there is a choice, it just isn’t a happy one. The Church must make a stand on this. The Churches of America need to give up their Worship of Mammon and Baal. If God wants you to be a church, you will be without the handout from Caesar. It is time for the church to be the Church, or just become the milk toast wishy wash I’m ok your ok, on the Cross offered, drink of wine mixed with gall that we get from Oprah and Joel Osteen. It is time to be the church and stand for something. It is 1933 again. Will you sign a pact with the Devil? Vote Republican this coming election, any other vote is against freedom and our way of life. Do it even if you have to put a cloths pine on your nose because Obama has got to be stopped. Hell, I’ll do it even if it’s Ron Paul. You decide!

Ding Dong, ol’ Mitt has won

Wow, can you believe it Patriots. Mitt has won not only the Hawkeye Cockeye, but the New Hampshire Primary. Wow, that’s just amazing isn’t it? Why that hasn’t happened since 1976. I must be a sign from above. Come on kids, (and Munchkins) sing it with me:

‘Ding Dong, ol’ Mitt has won, which ol Mitt, Ol Gov’ner Mitt
Ding Dong ol’ RINO Mitt has won.
Give up, Everyone, Give up Newt and give up Ricks
Ding Dong ol’ RINO Mitt has won.’

And that goes for you voters as well. Oops, hold it right there Ron, you too.

You would think by listening to those, ah…pundits on TV that the race was over and everyone else just needs to shut up sit down and get out of the way wouldn’t you? Is that what you feel like doing? I didn’t think so.

I don’t think that I want the voters of Iowa and New Hamp to pick my candidate. No disrespect to them but what gives them the right to drop a house on the rest of the field? If any of you recall or have bothered to see for yourselves, we were told the same thing in 1976.

Incumbent President Gerald Ford faced a strong primary challenge from Ronald Reagan. The former California Governor was a popular among the GOP’s conservative wing. Conservatives saw that like his predecessor Richard Nixon, Ford was not a conservative. The race for the nomination was the last one by the Republicans to have not been decided by the start of the party convention.

Ford narrowly defeated Reagan in the New Hampshire primary, and then proceeded to beat Reagan in Florida and Illinois. By the North Carolina primary in March 1976, Reagan’s campaign was nearly out of money, and many believed that another defeat would force Reagan to quit the race. Many in the GOP establishment were openly asking Reagan to get with the Party and get out of the way. With the assistance of the political organization of U.S. Senator Jesse Helms, Reagan upset Ford in North Carolina and then proceeded to win a string of impressive victories, including Texas. Ford did win in his home state of Michigan, and from there the two candidates battled for delegates. By the time the Republican Convention opened in August 1976 the nomination was too close to call.

At the start of the 1976 Republican National Convention in Kansas City, Ford had a slight lead in delegate votes, but was still short of the 1130 delegates he needed to win. Reagan’s choice of Senator Richard Schweiker of Pennsylvania, a Northern moderate, to be his running mate has been said to have caused Mississippi’s Chairman Clarke Reed, to switch the states votes to Ford, giving him a narrow 1187 delegates to Reagan’s 1070.

What’s the point of this entire useless trivia you ask? The point is this, aren’t we always being told that we just need to accept who ever they tell us to. Haven’t we been told for the last 2 years that Mitt Romney was, “The Front Runner, the Presumptive Choice” and other piles of RINO dung?

To make matters all the worse, we have independents and Democrats voting in the GOP primaries. How has that worked for us in the past. Ford, Dole, McCain and now Romney. Does anyone see a pattern here? It seems that the Republic leaders, whether while serving in Congress, running their mouths on TV or in backing “Moderate” (that’s liberal to you and me) candidates against conservatives are always telling us what we need to accept. Open wide and say ahh. Oh, and this is going to sting a little.”

And to pile on a little more, some of those still in the running, namely Perry and Newt, have decided to take Obama’s left wing approach in an effort to dry gulch Romney. Both are using the very same tack that Obama would when he attacks freedom and capitalism. Equating Romney with Wall Street bankers and evil corporations and saying that he is the cause for peoples woe’s is not going to make them look more conservative. It makes them look like leftist Wall Street Occupiers.

I have always liked Rick Perry and Newt. I like Perry as Governor and have admired Newt for decades. But they have lost my support to be our President with their attacks against Mitt using Obama, Reid and Pelosi tactics. Now don’t jump to any crazy conclusions here, Mitt is still as he has always been, RINO, Par Excellence. And don’t think that we are stuck with Ol’ Ron Paul either. I know he is popular with 20somethings and independents, but, he’s Ron Paul. Need I say more? Why is it he may skip a few areas where independents can vote? Humn, I don’t know.

I guess that would leave conservatives with the other Rick wouldn’t it? Santorum is a social conservative that sees government as the problem but at the same times sees it as a solution to problems that only government can take care of. In 2006, U2 front man Bono told New York Times columnist David Brooks, “I would suggest that Rick Santorum has a kind of Tourette’s disease; he will always say the most unpopular thing. But on our issues, he has been a defender of the most vulnerable.” I think that conservatives could say the same couldn’t we?

I would like to ask all of the candidates to remain in the fight as long as they have enough money to stand on a box, on a street corner, and yell through a rolled up newspaper megaphone. Stay in the fight because we need to have hope that we will change the Oval office in November. Please fight on.

‘Ding Dong, ol’ Mitt aint won, still got Newt, still got Ricks
Ding Dong ol’ RINO Mitt aint won.
Stay in, till Obama’s done, House is kept, Senate won
Ding Dong ol’ RINO Mitt aint won.’

If you are reading this, you are the Resistance.

The Extinction of the Dodo. (Raphus cucullatus)

The Dodo, or the American People, you decide

The Dodo, or the American People, you decide

Patriots, Is it just me, or is this whole Republic going the way of a digested burrito? That’s the funny thing about a bean burrito, once you remove the flour tortilla it looks the same, before you eat it, and after you eat it. Sorry for the crudeness, but I how you’ll see the point.

There was a time, long, long ago, a group of crazy knuckleheads decided that they were tired of being kicked around by a pansy assed boy-man. So these nuts got together and created something we so nostalgically refer to as “The Constitution of the United States of America” Any of you remember that thing? I know I have a copy or ten of it lying around here somewhere.

Before that, this ill formed band of miscreants wrote a little document they called, “The Declaration of Independence”. I am sure it’s all coming back to you now. At least I hope it is. Remember it now? Sure you do, you remember both of them don’t you.

Funny thing is though, those in Washington D.C., in Congress seemed to have forgotten that. You are probably jumping in right here with a little scream and saying, “Congress, what about Obama?” Well you see, Obama hasn’t forgotten the Constitution he has just chosen not to abide by it.

After 3 long years of these, ahh, people in the White House, so many of We The People still seem to fall back on “Why would he do that?” and “Doesn’t he understand?” and “I just cant understand it…” WAKE UP! If you haven’t awoken to this mans agenda by now, please do us all a huge favor and don’t vote. Better yet, have yourselves spayed and neutered so we don’t have our votes cancelled by the likes of your malformed offspring.

Sorry, I just had to get that out. Now, back to the Republican Party. What’s with all of the crap we have been hearing from the Republican candidates and their school yard B.S. Calling each other names and spouting, “wha, wha, Lil’ Newty called me a bad word,” and “Mitty is just a big bully” and “Teacher, Ronnie is talking to his imaginary friends again.” Enough! They Republic is being stolen and all the GOP’s cares about is getting their own seats back. Sorry, this is musical chairs you bunch of infantile dummies. And all of the seats are being removed while you set around in poopy diapers.

Ok, ok, I feel off into their name calling, sorry. But they are dodo heads.

President Obama chose this week to claim new powers for himself by making recess appointments while Congress wasn’t legally in recess. “I refuse to take ‘No’ for an answer,” he said while hastening the demise of the Constitution.

This isn’t the first example of Obama’s increasing tendency to govern with executive-branch powers. He has already explained that “where Congress is not willing to act, we’re going to go ahead and do it ourselves.” On a variety of issues, from immigration to the environment to labor law, that’s just what he’s been doing. Is anyone willing to bet that he will take even more freedoms from Congress and the People should he win reelection? Sharia Law in American Courts, 2nd Amendment, hell, 1st Amendment, “Hate Speech” laws anyone? The 2010 elections have meant nothing to this man or to the Democratic Party. They have stayed their courses and the hell with the GOP and Americans in general. Why stop now, the GOP and the rest of the Democrat Party are letting them get away with it aren’t they?

Much of the administration’s approach has to do with a change in the nature of liberal politics. The days of FDR saving the Republic are long gone and forgotten. Today’s progressives resemble the medieval clerical class. So mush for having a Sunny Inquisition. Their goal is governmental control over everything, from how we choose to live our lives, what food we eat, to even how we think and believe. Just let any of them hear you refer to Climate Gate being filled with lies and made up so called facts found in emails. Today’s progressives are as dogmatic in their beliefs as were Jerry Falwell and Osama Bin Laden. Al Gore, “The debate over climate change is closed.”

The problem is between those, (The elected class) who know what’s good and a presumptively ignorant majority (You and me). Joe Klein, a so called writer for Time says, ‘Obama is burdened, by governing a “nation of dodos” that is “too dumb to thrive,” without the guidance of our president.’ But, since We the People are too deluded to cooperate, the progressives have a solution. They, in their infinite wisdom will just give us European-style governance by a largely unelected bureaucratic class.

Progressives seemed uninterested in moderating their agenda even after having their ass’ handed to them in 2010. Left-wing Obama water girls Katrina vanden Heuvel of The Nation and Robert Borosage of the Institute for Policy Studies went so far as to argue that Obama should bypass Congress whenever necessary and govern using his executive authority over the government’s regulatory agencies. B. Hussein seems to have liked that idea.

John Podesta of the Center for American Progress, a left-liberal think tank has written, “The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president significant authority to make and implement policy… These authorities can be used to ensure positive progress on many of the key issues facing the country.”

If Obama does win, 2013 could possibly bring an end to the Constitution based republic they we still have. With the House and perhaps the Senate in Republican hands, Obama’s band of Inquisitional clerics may be tempted to use the full range of executive power. The logic for running the country from the executive has been laid out already. Chicago congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. argues, “Republican control of just the House, has made America ungovernable.” Obama, he said during the fight over the debt limit, needed to bypass the Constitution because, as in 1861 when the South was “in a state of rebellion” against lawful authority, the current GOP lead House is as well. Beverley Perdue, the Democratic governor of North Carolina, concurred: she wanted to have elections suspended for a stretch.

If Obama does win in 2012, a victorious Obama administration will further embrace a soft version of the Chinese government model. The mechanisms of control already exist. The bureaucratic apparatus, the array of policy czars and regulatory enforcers commissioned by the executive branch, has grown dramatically under Obama. Their ability to control and prosecute people for violations relating to issues like labor and the environment can be further enhanced. In the post-election environment, the president, using agencies like the EPA, could successfully strangle whole industries, notably the oil and natural gas sector.

A 2012 victory will most assuredly give Obama the go ahead to bring heavy restrictions on 1st and 2nd Amendment rights that Americans have had since our Republic’s formation, if not out and out gun confiscation and prosecutions for political speech. We could see restrictions on the rights of free Americans to use the words, “Islamic Terrorists” and churches rights to speak on biblical issues just like in Europe and Canada. Expansions of affirmative action, gay rights, and abortion rights could become mandated from Washington.

2012 may well become a nightmare scenario if Obama is reelected. It will further the constitutional crisis’ pitting this relentless executive branch power grab against a disgruntled, alienated GOP opposition. It shows especially foreboding because of the Republican Parties lack of strong and intelligent leadership. Their lack of a spine may well stem from their spending too much time in D.C. or they might just see us as dodo’s as well.

Over the coming weeks, months and years, the new authoritarians in the Obama Administration and their sycophant Progressive worshipers will elicit even more opposition and disdain from, “We the Dodos” who make up the majority of Americans residing in the great landmass between the coasts. The legacy of the Obama years, once so breathlessly associated with hope and reconciliation, the lowering of the seas, the tears of those wishing for change, a day of universal love may instead be growing pessimism, polarization and may end in rebellion.

As an aside, I have started a new blog that will be focusing on the war between the Western Civilization and Islam. Please check in if you like,
http://fallingofftheedgeoftheworld-krumbruce.blogspot.com/

And remember, “Pertinax usque ad mortem” Defiant to the end

If you are reading this, You are the resistance.

2012 and the end of the Republican Party

As this election approaches, it seems the conservatives of this great Republic are once again being courted by charlatans. Why is it that conservative’s are only worth speaking to or about, or that the political candidates only act conservative during their election campaigns. It comes down to the political process’ inherent disdain for the conservatives of this great Republic.

“ ‘Baw’, ‘foul’ ‘that’s not true’ “ the GOP may say. Well, maybe, maybe not. To the Republican Party elite and to those of the GOP that only refer to themselves as conservatives during elections because that is the only time they will lower themselves to us that moniker, it is how it seems to the conservative voter.

True conservatives of this nation are day by day becoming less and less likely to vote Republican. For decades, conservatives have been forced to vote for the Republican candidate for President and U.S. Congress in order to slow the liberal coup d’état of the Democrat Party. The day of the 3rd Party and the death of the Republican Party are fast approaching.

It seems to the average voter in this, the greatest nation on Gods green earth, that the Republican establishment is so afraid of Barack Hussein Obama that they have all but conceded the general election to him. It also seems that they have decided to concentrate on retaking the Senate and increasing their majority in the House. Both of these endeavors would be wonderful things if it were not for their accepted defeat by Obama.

Why is it that they are afraid of Obama? Why won’t they fight against him as he will fight against them? Will this GOP candidate put on the same dog and pony show that John, ‘Yosemite Sam’ McCain did in the last election? McCain didn’t use anything against Obama, none of the questions raised about him or his lake of ever having a responsible job or any experience. The GOP Party seems to be headed in the same direction again. Republicans just don’t have it in them to be winners.

A word of advice to the Republican Party. As one who has voted Republican in every election since being old enough, it pains me and saddens me to say they the GOP’s days are coming to an end. The Grand ole Party’s is declining because of its leader’s inability to stop the liberal train in its fundamental change of OUR nation. Whether the GOP believes what conservatives are saying doesn’t matter. It is what conservatives feel, think and believe about the GOP that matters.

Conservatives feel lied to, abandoned and betrayed by the GOP, every chance the Republican’s get, especially since the coronation of B. Hussein Obama to “just go along to get along” they do and at their own peril. Conservatives, Christians and the working middle class of this Republic have had it with the GOP. It is time for the Republicans to stand up and be something besides the RINO dominated, Boehner lead, “Oh well, we’re only 1/2 of 1/3” that they have been. Conservatives are looking for a Conservative Republican leader that will do for the Constitution and the average American what Obama has done for the leftists and liberals. Time to stand and deliver or get out of the way GOP.

Those running the GOP may think this is wrong but its not. The GOP’s days are finished if they don’t return o the light side of the force. But there is a chance for the Republican Party to save itself. A chance, to once again be the Conservative side of this nation’s government. How you ask?

Win or lose in the upcoming Presidential Election, the Republican Party has to really fight for he Constitution and Conservative values of its long time voters. There is a chance that because Obama is the Democratic contender, the conservative may still side with the GOP in an effort to save our Republic, but that is the only reason. The only way the GOP can be saved right now, in this 2012 election is Barack Obama.

Obama’s vision for this nation is a complete 180 from the conservative Americans. That is where the GOP comes in. A 3rd party candidate will give Obama another 4 years in office. A 3rd party candidate will not only end the United States of America as we have known it but will end the Republican Party as the dominate ‘conservative’ side of the American politic.

What can the GOP do? They can stand up against the Democrats and fight them. Speak the truth and it will set them free. Win or lose, fighting on the side of the conservative voter is the right thing to do. Conservatives of today have awoken and they will never again be used as a parking lot prom date to be used at the election and then sent away to find their own ride home. GOP, it’s up to you to save your party.

The way to save the party is to mount a real campaign against Obama. Not the namby pamby sugar coated dribble of the McCain or Dole Campaign’s. But a real damn fight to the finish with the intent to win. Republicans have to want to fight and want to win or their finished. Stand toe to toe, bring a gun to a knife fight, and fight fire with fire kind of campaign. Beat Obama damn it.

If the republican doesn’t win this 2012 election it is their own fault. Obama is ripe for the defeating. Republicans have got to take advantage of that. Romney and Newt are really and truly not the path to take. Romney comes off as wanting to win no matter what stand he has to take or which side of an issue he has to take, even if it’s both sides, as he has done. Newt, although he is probably the most brilliant of republicans, carries more baggage than freight train and right or wrong, changed or not, he did set on a couch with Queen Nancy. Conservatives feel that those in the GOP establishment are grabbing their noses and forcing them to swallow the GOP’s pick. Again!!! It will end the GOP

The Republican Party stands at a cross roads. One direction takes them the way of the Wig Party. One takes them the way of the Reform Party. It is time to return to the conservatives of this Republic Republicans. With out a return to this, the conservative voter will split their votes until they find a true conservative to lead them. But, unfortunately for our republic, that will be too late. People are fed up with the process and are looking for a fight and a fighter to lead them. So called conservative pundits keep telling us that Romney is the way, well, he AINT, GOP, he aint. He may be your choice and he may well win in 2012, but if he does, he will be the end of the party. The leaders of the GOP may think that this anger toward the establishment, whether Republican or Democrat may pass after Obama, but their wrong. It is only the beginning. Conservatives have had it and their going to either take back this country as a whole or in pieces. This is not hyperbole, it is a fact. The under current running through this Republic is real and its coming to a head. And it’s coming soon. And Hell will follow with it. Time for the GOP to act.

If the Republicans run a good campaign, if they win the election, if they reverse EVERYTHING the Obama and Reed/Pelosi camps have done, if they act and think conservative, they stand a chance at preserving the GOP. If they don’t, then Ya’ll may as well ease on up to the table, because the goose is cooked and the 3rd Party has come to the feast.

Bravo Mr. President and Happy New YearPatriots,

 As this new day dawns upon The United States of America, I just wanted to pass along a few highlights from President Obama statement when signing the NDAA.

A few Yea’s and Boo’s Will accompany this quoting but for the most part, the President is siding with Patriotsagainst a Congressional insurgency aimed at our Constitutional rights. The complete statement here

 The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

December 31, 2011

Statement by the President on H.R. 1540

Today I have signed into law H.R. 1540, the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.” I have signed the Act chiefly because it authorizes funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, crucial services for service members and their families, and vital national security programs that must be renewed…

The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it. In particular, I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists…

 …some in Congress continue to insist upon restricting the options available to our counterterrorism professionals and interfering with the very operations that have kept us safe. My Administration has consistently opposed such measures. Ultimately, I decided to sign this bill not only because of the critically important services it provides for our forces and their families and the national security programs it authorizes, but also because the Congress revised provisions that otherwise would have jeopardized the safety, security, and liberty of the American people. Moving forward, my Administration will interpret and implement the provisions described below in a manner that best preserves the flexibility on which our safety depends and upholds the values on which this country was founded.

 Section 1021 affirms the executive branch’s authority to detain persons covered by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). This section breaks no new ground and is unnecessary. The authority it describes was included in the 2001 AUMF, as recognized by the Supreme Court and confirmed through lower court decisions since then. Two critical limitations in section 1021 confirm that it solely codifies established authorities. First, under section 1021(d), the bill does not “limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.” Second, under section 1021(e), the bill may not be construed to affect any “existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.” My Administration strongly supported the inclusion of these limitations in order to make clear beyond doubt that the legislation does nothing more than confirm authorities that the Federal courts have recognized as lawful under the 2001 AUMF. Moreover, I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation. My Administration will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.

Section 1022 seeks to require military custody for a narrow category of non-citizen detainees who are “captured in the course of hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.” This section is ill-conceived and will do nothing to improve the security of the United States…Yea so far.

 And now a Boo…

Sections 1026-1028 continue unwise funding restrictions that curtail options available to the executive branch. Section 1027 renews the bar against using appropriated funds for fiscal year 2012 to transfer Guantanamo detainees into the United States for any purpose. I continue to oppose this provision…

 And now anotherBoo. Mostly because of its continued support and installation of powers to an already broken Justice dept. under the current Att. Gen. Holder. AsPatriots, we understand that this particular head of the Dept. is not interested in equal protection of all Americans, but only in his own interests.

Section 1029 requires that the Attorney General consult with the Director of National Intelligence and Secretary of Defense prior to filing criminal charges against or seeking an indictment of certain individuals. I sign this based on the understanding that apart from detainees held by the military outside of the United States under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, the provision applies only to those individuals who have been determined to be covered persons under section 1022 before the Justice Department files charges or seeks an indictment. Notwithstanding that limitation, this provision represents an intrusion into the functions and prerogatives of the Department of Justice and offends the longstanding legal tradition that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions should be vested with the Attorney General free from outside interference. Moreover, section 1029 could impede flexibility and hinder exigent operational judgments in a manner that damages our security. My Administration will interpret and implement section 1029 in a manner that preserves the operational flexibility of our counterterrorism and law enforcement professionals, limits delays in the investigative process, ensures that critical executive branch functions are not inhibited, and preserves the integrity and independence of the Department of Justice.

And now let’s finish with a seriousBoo and a thank you to the Congress on this one.

Other provisions in this bill above could interfere with my constitutional foreign affairs powers. Section 1244 requires the President to submit a report to the Congress 60 days prior to sharing any U.S. classified ballistic missile defense information with Russia. Section 1244 further specifies that this report include a detailed description of the classified information to be provided. While my Administration intends to keep the Congress fully informed of the status of U.S. efforts to cooperate with the Russian Federation on ballistic missile defense, my Administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 in a manner that does not interfere with the President’s constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications. Other sections pose similar problems. Sections 1231, 1240, 1241, and 1242 could be read to require the disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications and national security secrets; and sections 1235, 1242, and 1245 would interfere with my constitutional authority to conduct foreign relations by directing the Executive to take certain positions in negotiations or discussions with foreign governments. Like section 1244, should any application of these provisions conflict with my constitutional authorities, I will treat the provisions as non-binding.

My Administration has worked tirelessly to reform or remove the provisions described above in order to facilitate the enactment of this vital legislation, but certain provisions remain concerning. My Administration will aggressively seek to mitigate those concerns through the design of implementation procedures and other authorities available to me as Chief Executive and Commander in Chief, will oppose any attempt to extend or expand them in the future, and will seek the repeal of any provisions that undermine the policies and values that have guided my Administration throughout my time in office.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 31, 2011.

So now what are we supposed to think? On the one hand, we have the President showing support for the freedoms that are ours and then turning around in a complete 180 and using his authority to end certain freedoms. TheBill of Rights and the Amendments to the Constitution?But, we must give him a thank you for his stand against the NDAA as it was put forth by GOPRINO’s Graham and McCain and their minions.

Its going to be a bumpy year 2012 will be. If the last 3 years have taught us anything, it must be that all of these persons in the Executive and Legislative branches of our Federal Government along with their political appointed brown shirts must be replaced if our freedoms are to survive. It’s crunch timePatriots, do what you can to preserve and protect your freedoms because who really knows what is going on behind the scenes with this group in D.C.